I agreed to review conference abstracts for a conference I’m not going to as a way to stay current with what’s new and hot in my field. When I signed up, they said that there would be maybe two dozen abstracts each person would have to review, which is a lot, but doable. When I got the assignment, however, there were more than 40 abstracts to review! Even worse, I listed one of my areas of expertise as (roughly) “combining two or more techniques,” which is a good description of my primary research interests, but I didn’t consider in terms of abstracts that means the topics I’m assigned are “combining ANY two or more techniques for ANY reason.” I have yet to come across an abstract that I feel completely unqualified to review, but some have been in fields I only know through coursework. I feel like I am learning more from reviewing these abstracts than I would by going to the conference.
After reading several abstracts, it’s clear what impresses me: statistics or quantitative data, figures, and references (though the references are mostly a proxy for placing the work in a larger context). Some people didn’t take the abstract submission very seriously and they say almost verbatim: “we took some data, analyzed it, and found a result.” I haven’t decided if those are in the reject pile yet: they are certainly “not even wrong,” so is the reject line at being wrong or being too vague to tell if they are wrong?
More Changes
17 hours ago
No comments:
Post a Comment